The right to conduct your own case without a lawyer - available in almost every civil court, and held to almost the same standards as a lawyer.
A person may generally represent themselves in their own civil case. The Latin term is pro se, sometimes pro per; the right is long-established and in federal court it is statutory. It is also extremely common: in many state civil dockets, particularly debt collection, eviction and family matters, at least one side is unrepresented in the majority of cases.
The rule that surprises people is that self-represented litigants are generally required to follow the same rules of procedure and evidence as lawyers. Courts frequently read self-drafted documents generously as to their substance, but that leniency does not extend to missing a filing deadline, failing to respond to a motion, or not objecting when the rules require it. The most common way a self-represented case is lost is procedural rather than substantive - the claim was fine and something was not filed in time.
Two limits are worth knowing at the outset. First, the right is personal: you may represent yourself, but you generally may not represent anyone else, and in almost every court a corporation or LLC must appear through a lawyer even if one person owns all of it. A parent generally cannot appear on behalf of a child's claim without counsel. Second, in criminal cases the position is entirely different - there is a constitutional right to appointed counsel where imprisonment may result, and self-representation there requires the court to satisfy itself that the waiver is knowing and voluntary.
Substantial help exists short of full representation. Most courts operate self-help centres with forms and procedural guidance, many run free duty-lawyer or advice clinics, and court staff can explain procedure even though they cannot give legal advice - a boundary worth understanding rather than resenting. Limited scope representation, in which a lawyer is retained to do one defined piece of work such as reviewing a document or appearing at a single hearing, is permitted in most states and is often the realistic middle option between full representation and none.
Self-representation is a reasonable choice in a small claims case, a simple uncontested matter, or where the amount genuinely does not justify the cost. It is a much harder proposition where the other side is represented, where the case turns on expert evidence, where a home or custody of a child is at stake, or where the opponent is an institution that litigates this exact case type every week. If full representation is out of reach, ask specifically about limited scope help and about the court's self-help centre before concluding you are on your own - and if you cannot afford the filing fee, ask about a fee waiver rather than not filing.
These directory pages each list at least one currently published law firm. The list is generated when this page loads, so a page whose listings have lapsed drops out rather than becoming a dead link.